My Publications :

The Dangerous Impact of Misinformation: How Corporate Consolidation is Eroding Local Journalism

With the upcoming Presidential election in November, there has been an upsurge in fear mongering “news” stories, particularly regarding migrant crime. Two of the most recent examples include a viral video and a story claiming that Venezuelan migrant gang members had taken over an apartment complex, brandishing weapons, and holding tenants hostage, forcing them to pay rent. This story has been circulated, without verification, by various news networks in the past couple of weeks, including CBS, F...

Palantir’s Shadowy Role: Government Contracts, Surveillance, and the Human Rights Dilemma

This is the opening sentence of Palantir’s Human Rights Policy document. If you haven’t heard of or come across them yet; Palantir Technologies, Inc. is a software company based in the United States that went public in 2020, dealing primarily in data. Or perhaps you have know the Palantir from the Lord of the Rings, the indestructible, all-seeing magical crystal ball that corrupted its users. In the company’s own words, theyWhat does this mean and why does it matter?In recent years if you have h...

Navigating Silence: The Ideological Struggle of Nonprofits Amid the Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have been involved with, work at, sit on the board of, or been privy to the internal workings of a nonprofit organization within the last year, you will, in all likelihood, have had the displeasure of witnessing the sector’s response (or lack thereof), internal upheaval, and power struggles over the Israel-Palestine conflict following the events of October 7th.The Israel-Palestine conflict has had the effect of igniting an ideological proxy war in not only the American workplace but more...

Historical Analysis, Multi-Dimensional Realities and Emerging Frameworks: International Mediation, Efficacy, Key Challenges and State-Building in Yemen’s Fragile Civil Conflict

This paper is organized into five divisions: the first section consists of two subsections, the first looks to provide a short historical context leading up to the emergence of the, along with an overview of the key actors, internal and external, and their interests/goals/grievances. With the goal to provide an understanding of the nature of the war. The second section focuses on studying the separate instances of third-party mediation from 2007 to present day, organized into 3 phases, distinguished by mediator type: phase 1 looking at Qatar’s mediation; phase 2 looking at GCC mediation; and phase 3 looking at UN-led mediation. This section describes the capacity in which the third-party actor intervened, and scrutinizes the outcome, the actual impacts and measures the relative success. The second section looks at the why dimension, realities on the ground in Yemen that, either due to a lack of understanding, shortcomings of capability, neglect in addressing (whether as a result of conflicting interests, lack of incentive, or negative incentives), or general institutional difficulties, are posing as key challenges preventing the resolution of conflict. This section looks at two categories: the first deals with shortcomings and failures of state-building institutions of Yemen that led to the current civil conflict, and their continued deterioration having gone unaddressed by mediation efforts. The second looks at new structures prevent peace and incentivizing conflict that international efforts have contributed in developing and maintaining. Lastly, it looks at the recommendations for policy approaches looking ahead that would best address key issues.

The Failure of Civil Society in Yemen: Preventing Civil War, and Prospects for Possible Future Role in Alleviation

Civil Society, and in particular Local Development Councils have the prospects of playing a crucial role in alleviate the humanitarian crisis and function in conflict resolution capacities. This is a particularly appealing option due to the fact that prior to the inset of the current conflict several groups and parties has advocated for this decentralized model of governance in Yemen.

Women's Rights and Freedom of Religion

After the initial passing of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) at the United Nations in 1981, many states declared ‘reservations.’ These reservations related to implementing the document's provisions in their respective states on the grounds that they violated the states' and communities' rights to Freedom of Religion or Belief (FORB). Among these nations were the People's Republic of Algeria, which claimed reservations on Articles 2 and 16 (P

Why The Sri Lankan President Is Attempting To Undermine The Human Rights Council Resolution

After the end of the 23-year-old civil war in Sri Lanka between the government and the Tamil Tigers and other ethnic minority separatist groups, a human rights organization decided that both the separatist groups and the government of Sri Lanka perpetrated human rights violations, some even counting up to the charge of war crimes. Following the report by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the United Nations, the Human Rights Council took up the matter drafting a resolution that was co-sponsored by the United States, Britan, and other nations, including Sri Lanka itself.

The Flawed Analysis Of The Report Connecting Immigration And Terrorism

The report, released by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, was initially supposed to be released coinciding with Trump's second executive order known as the 'Muslim Ban' in order to legitimize it but for some reason was delayed. Even the current release date of the report seems less than coincidental, as the Trump administration attempts to create immigration policy and prevent a government shutdown.

Does International Human Rights Law Work?

The strengthening of rights is not a process that can be linked to single causations, but rather interweaving strands of a rope. According to the Chicago Journal of International Law: “What pulls human rights forward is not a series of separate, parallel cords, but a 'rope' of multiple, interwoven strands. Remove one strand, and the entire rope is weakened. International human rights law is a strand woven throughout the length of the rope. Its main value is not in how much rights protection it can pull as a single strand, but in how it strengthens the entire rope.” This hypothesis can be most accurately proven by anecdotal evidence. However, empirical evidence is challenging to construct in this kind of analysis due to the complexities involved, and its habit of often misrepresenting reality. But this should not be seen as detrimental to the argument, let alone proof that the international human rights law has failed.

Is The World Really Getting Worse?

Is it possible that this visually grim depiction is not accurate or representative of reality? At face value, the empirical data presented seems to comply with the central claims put forth by those that argue that advancement in human rights respect has stalled. But there lies a foundational issue with most data presented in this matter, which is an issue that lies in origin. According to an article for Foreign Policy: “The problem is that the rules used to do this summarizing have remained more or less consistent over time, but the reports themselves have not. Over the past four decades, the human rights reporting process and the international legal context in which that reporting occurs have both changed significantly." The biggest change has been that these organizations are now much more aware of the violations taking place; the more you know, the worse things look.

Is Trump Succeeding At Discrediting The Media?

This came to fuller light after Monday's press brief at the White House when Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders claimed that "bias in news reports has gotten 'out of control' and 'should be taken seriously,' dismissing journalists who attributed recent errors to honest mistakes that were corrected." Huckabee added that these were not honest claims but rather that the news networks were purposely putting out false and inaccurate reports and statements with malicious intent.
Load More Articles